The jury will evaluate the applications of Stage-I based on the following criteria:
Uniqueness and originality of the design proposal,
Architectural expression, language , form,
Landscape sensitivity and responsible ecological enhancement ,
Economic viability with sustainable solutions,
Partnership (of local and international firms),
Professional Team Composition
The scoring criteria to be used for evaluation will be as follows:
The jury will assess the competition entries as per following criteria stated as under :
S. No | Description | Marks | Remarks | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Landscape design proposal, work plan and methodology | 70 | ||
1a |
|
35 | 50% of the maximum marks shall be awarded for the uniqueness of the proposed master plan for the area. | |
1b |
Economic viability, sustainability and cost analysis.
|
15 | The remaining 50% shall be awarded for (a) operation and maintenance model; (b) tentative Project cost; (c) phasing of the project and practicality of proposed time-lines; (d) self-sustainability of the proposed plan; and (e) adoption of green technology |
|
1c | Partnership (of local and international firms), | 10 | ||
1d | Professional Team Composition | 10 | ||
2 | Past Experience in such projects | 10 | 30% of the maximum marks shall be awarded for the number of Eligible Assignments undertaken by the Applicant firm. The remaining 70% shall be awarded for: (i) the comparative size and quality of Eligible Assignmen (ii) overall turnover, experience and capacity of the firm; (iii) Any international award or commendation; and (iv) any certification from GRIHA/ LEED for sustainable projects. |
|
3 | Relevant experience of the Key personnel | 20 | 25% of the maximum marks for each Key Personnel shall be awarded for the number of Eligible Assignments the respective Key Personnel has worked on. The remaining 75% shall be awarded for: (i) the comparative size and quality of Eligible Assignments; and (ii) other relevant assignments or similar work in infrastructure sectors. |
|
3a | Team Leader | 8 | ||
3b | Urban Designer | 3 | ||
3c | Infrastructure Expert | 3 | ||
3d | Green Building/Sustainability expert | 3 | ||
3e | Project Management Consultant | 3 | ||
TOTAL | 100 |
The jury will assess the Stage-II entries as per following design intent:
Development of the design idea,
Response to and compliance with technical brief ,
Overall quality of proposed approach and design concept including its potential to act as a landmark,
Minimization of future maintenance liabilities and operational costs
The marking will be as under.
Criteria | Weightage | |
---|---|---|
Development of Landscape Concept Design Idea, sustainable strategies ecosystems | 45 | |
Iconic landscape features and Architecture | 25 | |
Urbanism | 10 | |
Technical aspects, Minimization of future maintenance liabilities and operational costs | 10 | |
Response to and compliance with technical brief , | 10 | |
total | 100 |